Here's your guide to what happened to the bills pro-LGBT advocates called a 'slate of hate'

The Tennessee General Assembly took up several bills this session that pro-LGBTQ activists branded a "slate of hate," condemning the various pieces of legislation for being discriminatory.

Dozens of businesses spoke out against the bills, including major companies like Amazon, Ikea, Nike, Marriott, Lyft, Hilton, Warner Music Group and AllianceBernstein, along with the Tennessee Titans, Nashville Predators and Nashville SC.  

Republican leaders in the legislature took different stances on the legislation, with House Speaker Glen Casada saying he was unconcerned about threats of businesses avoiding the state and that companies should stay out of politics

In the Senate, however, Lt. Gov. Randy McNally was reluctant to push several of the bills, explaining that the state needed to be sensitive to the business implications of the various bills.

His concerns carried weight. In the final days of session, the Senate deferred action on multiple bills criticized by the LGBT community.

Here's an update on where the bills all stand.

School districts and bathrooms

Bill Number: SB1499/HB1274

Bill Purpose: The legislation would have allowed the state attorney general to represent local school districts that adopt policies requiring students to use facilities based on their sex at birth. 

Sponsor(s):Sen. Joey Hensley, R-Hohenwald, and  Rep. Andy Holt, R-Dresden

Status: The Senate opted against voting on the measure, sending it instead to be considered in 2020.

SENATE ACTION:Senate rejects controversial bathroom bill, opting to delay action until 2020

HOUSE ACTION:Indecent exposure legislation criticized by opponents as 'bathroom bill' passes Tennessee House

Same-sex couples and adoption

Bill Number: SB848/HB1152

Bill Purpose: The bill would have allowed adoption agencies to deny services to couples for religious reasons.

Sponsor(s): Sen. Joey Hensley, R-Hohenwald, and Rep. John Ragan, R-Oak Ridge,

Status: The bill did not advance and remains assigned to legislative committees.

Child placement agencies and same-sex couples

Bill Number: HB836/SB1304

Bill Purpose: Similar to the bill above. The bill would have prohibited private licensed child-placing agencies from doing anything that "would violate the agency's written religious or moral convictions."

Sponsors: Rep. Tim Rudd, R-Murfreesboro and Sen. Paul Rose, R-Tipton

Status: The House passed the bill 67-22. But the Senate reset the legislation for the start of the 2020 legislative session.

READ MORE:Don't get 'involved in politics,' Casada tells businesses opposed to Tennessee's anti-LGBT bills

Internal policies of businesses

Bill Number: SB0364/HB0663

Bill Purpose: State and local governmental agencies would not be able to take action against any businesses internal policies. Critics of the bill say this would allow businesses to discriminate.

Sponsors: Sen Paul Rose, R-Tipton, and Rep. Jason Zachary, R-Knoxville

Status: The House passed the bill 68-22. But the Senate delayed action until 2020.

Indecent exposure in bathrooms

Bill Number: SB1297/HB1151

Bill Purpose: The bill seeks to enhance punishment for any person who who commits indecent exposure in bathrooms, dressing rooms, etc. It would include offenses committed by offenders who are members of the opposite sex than the sex designated by the bathroom's use.

Sponsors: Rep. John Ragan, R-Oak Ridge, and Sen. Mark Pody, R-Lebanon

Bill Status: The House passed the bill 69-25 and the Senate approved it on a 21-5 vote. Gov. Bill Lee signed the legislation into law on Thursday, May 2.

Definition of marriage

Bill Number: HB1369/SB1282

Bill Purpose: To define marriage as between one man and one woman.

Sponsors: Rep. Jerry Sexton, R-Bean Station, and Senator Mark Pody, R-Lebanon

Status: This bill never advanced in committee during this year's legislative session.

READ MORE:Indecent exposure legislation criticized by opponents as 'bathroom bill' passes Tennessee House

READ MORE:Tennessee bill seeking to bolster indecent exposure law draws concern from LGBTQ community