Logo

Action Center

Speak Out to Protect the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
On June 11, 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin proposed rolling back critical protections against Mercury and air toxics—part of a broader agenda that prioritizes polluters over public health.  We must speak out again to stop this reversal and defend the rule health and environmental advocates fought for. 

 

Thanks to powerful public testimony and nationwide advocacy, the EPA finalized stronger Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) in 2024. These protections have already cut mercury pollution from power plants by 90%—a historic achievement that reflects both overwhelming scientific consensus and overwhelming public support, with 82% of voters in favor. But now, those hard-won safeguards are under threat.

Why MATS Matters

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin. Mercury released by coal-fired power plants enters our rivers and lakes, builds up in fish, and makes its way into our bodies. Both the pregnant individual and the developing fetus can be affected. An infant exposed to mercury is at risk for permanent brain damage that can lead to learning disabilities, developmental delays, and birth defects. 

The 2024 MATS update was a crucial step forward. It strengthened mercury limits for the dirtiest plants—especially those burning lignite coal—and tightened controls on other hazardous metals. These actions were grounded in science and public health data.


By 2028, the finalized MATS standards are projected to prevent emissions of:

  • 1,000 pounds of mercury
  • 770 tons of fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
  • 280 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOₓ)
  • 65,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO₂)
  • At least 7 tons of non-mercury hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals, including arsenic, chromium, and lead

These reductions represent lives saved and illnesses prevented. Coal plants emit more than 80 toxic pollutants, many of which are linked to cancer, heart disease, asthma, birth defects, and premature death. These pollutants harm people living near the plants and communities hundreds of miles downwind.

Implementation of the rule would result in $300 million in annual health benefits and $130 million in climate benefits. 


The EPA needs to hear your trusted voice as a health professional on why these standards are essential to health.


 


 

    Subject
    Message Body
    Post
    Suggested Message
    Post
    Remaining: 0
  • Hide
    • Please call this number:

      Please do not close this window. You will need to come back to this window to enter your code.
      We just sent an email to ... containing a verification code.

      If you do not see the email within the next five minutes, please ensure you entered the correct email address and check your spam/junk mail folder.
      Enter Your Info