This week, confirmation hearings began for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Joe Biden's extreme, left-wing nominee to replace liberal Justice Stephen Breyer on the U.S. Supreme Court.
And now more than ever, it's little surprise why he picked her: Brown Jackson is sure to be a reliably radical member of the bench, and, more so, provide the radical left with a lockstep ally on our nation's highest court in cases that address their dangerous political and social agenda.
Please join this urgent campaign calling on members of the U.S. Senate to REJECT Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court, and SHARE it with like-minded friends and family members.
Ketanji Brown Jackson, a current D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge, is the first black woman ever appointed to the Supreme Court and, predictably, the left is busy prioritizing her race and gender as qualifications to serve on the Supreme Court rather than acknowledge her atrocious, politically-motivated record as a jurist.
For instance, in the 1990s, she wrote an amicus brief defending a Massachusetts law that banned protests outside of abortion clinics. Thankfully, the law was ruled unconstitutional in 2000, but nonetheless, Brown Jackson's concerning position should raise an automatic red flag, and demonstrate just how she intends to interpret and apply the law in order to silence free speech in support of abortion should she be confirmed to serve on the Supreme Court.
Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, echoed this sentiment, confirming her organization's opposition to Brown Jackson's nomination by stating that Brown Jackson "is on record opposing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates pleading to save lives outside abortion centers and supporting the false claim that abortion is ‘health care.’"
This outlook was reflected in her performance thus far during this week's hearings: When asked by Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) when, in her opinion, life begins, Brown Jackson simply responded "I don't know." He pressed her further by asking when equal protection under the law attach to a human being, to which she responded: "I actually don't know the answer to that question."
Her poor, and potentially deadly, judgment doesn't end there: Brown Jackson failed to defend her record, as both a federal judge and member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, of supporting lighter sentences for child sex predators, advocating for eliminating the mandatory minimum sentence for child porn, and opposing requiring convicts to register as sex offenders.
Likewise, when asked by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) if she could simply provide a definition for the word 'woman,' Brown Jackson replied "No. I can't. Not in this context. I'm not a biologist."
If Ketanji Brown Jackson believes one must be a biologist in order to know the difference between a man and a woman, we surely cannot rely on her to acknowledge the scientific fact that life begins at conception, let alone renounce her past rulings and adopt a new adherence to the text of the U.S. Constitution.
Her nomination must be opposed.
Please take this opportunity to urge your U.S. Senators to oppose radical Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court, and to only support a nominee who will faithfully uphold our nation's founding document by protecting every American's constitutional rights.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson grilled by senator on when life begins: ‘I don’t know’' (LifeSiteNews)
'Sen. Hawley slams Biden SCOTUS pick for ‘alarming’ record of letting child porn offenders ‘off the hook’' (LifeSiteNews)
'Biden’s SCOTUS pick dodged question on defining ‘woman’ because Dems are all-in on gender ideology' (LifeSiteNews)
**Photo Credit: YouTube (screenshot)