LB 911, as written, is factually inaccurate, internally inconsistent, and misaligned with existing Nebraska law, DHHS authority, and nationally recognized standards of care. The bill references requirements that do not exist, assigns enforcement powers to an advisory board that lacks statutory authority, and introduces vague and contradictory language that providers cannot reasonably interpret or comply with. Most concerning, LB 911 would arbitrarily restrict the use of telehealth and supervision models that are already carefully regulated by DHHS, clinically justified, ethically governed, and essential for ensuring access to care—particularly for children with autism and their families residing in rural Nebraska.

Nebraska does not need duplicative, conflicting, or unworkable legislation that risks reducing access to medically necessary services and undermining established oversight structures that are already functioning as intended. We respectfully urge the withdrawal of LB 911 from the hearing on February 4th, or urge the Health and Human Services Committee members to vote against this harmful bill.   We encourage meaningful collaboration with DHHS, providers, and professional organizations—including the Council of Autism Service Providers and the Nebraska Association for Behavior Analysis—to develop policy that is accurate, enforceable, and aligned with best practice. Nebraska’s children and families deserve thoughtful, evidence-based regulation that protects access to care rather than unintentionally limiting it.