Similar questions have now emerged around the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)—a long-standing, scientifically independent panel of 16 volunteer experts in clinical care, research, and public health. Members are uncompensated, serve four-year terms, and undergo extensive conflict-of-interest reviews.

The USPSTF issues evidence-based recommendations on screenings, counseling services, and preventive medications through a rigorous, multi-step process involving evidence-based practice centers, public comment, and topic experts. These recommendations guide clinical practice and determine which preventive services must be covered without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act.

This year, multiple USPSTF meetings, including the July session and the most recent November meeting, were postponed or canceled, raising concerns about delays in issuing timely preventive care guidance.

The Task Force remains one of the most transparent federal entities, with all recommendations and evidence reviews publicly available. Following the Kennedy v. Braidwood ruling reaffirming the Secretary’s authority to appoint and remove members, it is essential that Congress protect the USPSTF’s independence. Any erosion of trust or interference in its work would undermine preventive care nationwide and disrupt access to proven, cost-effective services.

Please contact your Senators and Representatives and urge them to safeguard the USPSTF’s current structure and operations. Policymakers must ensure that preventive care recommendations continue to be based on science.