Tennessee Eagle Forum Newsletter
 December 10, 2013
Inside this issue
  Morristown, TN - The Romeike Story  
   

Top

  Supreme Court Orders Obama Admin to Respond to Christian Homeschooling Family's Appeal  
 

WASHINGTON – The United States Supreme Court has ordered Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice to respond to a petition to appeal from a Christian homeschooling family that is fighting deportation to their homeland of Germany.

As previously reported, Ewe and Hannelore Romeike have been battling the matter in the courts for several years while continuing to raise their six children in rural Tennessee. The Romeike family fled to the United States in 2008 after German authorities demanded that they stop homeschooling in violation of national law.

Homeschooling was made illegal in the country in 1938 under the dictatorship of Adolph Hitler, and the law has never been repealed, but rather strengthened. In 2007, the German Supreme Court ruled that the country’s mandate that children be sent to public school is necessary to “counteract the development of religious and philosophically motivated parallel societies.”

German officials have been cracking down on families that keep their sons and daughters at home, and have threatened them with fines, imprisonment and even the removal of the children from the household. The Romeike children were taken from their parents for a time before fleeing to the United States for refuge.
 

In 2010, Memphis immigration judge Lawrence Burman granted the family asylum, stating that he believed the Romeike’s would face persecution for their faith if they returned to Germany. However, the Department of Justice later appealed the ruling to the Sixth Circuit, which overturned Burman’s decision.

“[T]he Romeikes [have] not shown that Germany’s enforcement of its general school-attendance law amounts to persecution against them, whether on grounds of religion or membership in a recognized social group,” the court ruled. “There is a difference between the persecution of a discrete group and the prosecution of those who violate a generally applicable law.”

In court documents filed by the Department of Justice, the Obama administration asserted that the requirement that German children be sent to public school is valid as the government seeks to create an “open, pluralistic society.” It asserted that German officials are not persecuting the family by mandating attendance since the law applies to all citizens, regardless of their religion.

 


 

Top

  Obama wrong to deport home school family seeking religious freedom  
 

SAN DIEGO, December 6, 2013 — They fled to the United States for religious freedom. Where will they go next if such freedom is denied?

An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is the latest dramatic chapter in an effort to save an Evangelical Christian family from being deported back to their home country of Germany where religious liberty was being pounded away by the government.
 

At stake is the determination of two parents (Uwe and Hannelore Romeike) to home school their children based upon their own religious convictions.

The Romeikes are being represented by the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA).

The Supreme Court appeal follows a major setback. The Obama administration sued the Romeikes to remove their asylum that had been granted in 2010. President Obama obtained his desired verdict from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Uwe and Hannelore Romeike are committed Christians and parents of six children. Their beliefs  include educating their own children. Unfortunately, home-schooling is against the law in Germany.

Back in 2008, the German government threatened legal action if the Romeiikes continued with their stand. They decided to flee to America and ended up in Tennessee.

At first it worked. Asylum was obtained from by a US judge. Then President Obama’s Justice Department decided to interfere and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals backed them up. Their ruling stated that Germany’s ban on home-schooling could not actually be called “persecution” and therefore did not qualify as a reason for political asylum.

Supposedly, financial retribution and threats of losing custody of your own children are not to be viewed as persecution. Germany’s “non-persecution” of Christian freedom has been going on since 1918, when school attendance was made a matter of law.
 

Speaking to ABC News, Michael Farris, the Romeike family’s attorney and the chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association, said, “We are very disappointed in the decision by the Sixth Circuit to deny political asylum to the Romeike family who wants the freedom to home-school their children…The decision of the court fails to even discuss the unchallenged evidence of Germany’s motive in banning homeschooling. The German Supreme Court says that they want to suppress religious and philosophical minorities.”

Evidently Germany’s court is not the only one where Farris smells an agenda. He also suspects an unstated motive beyond the Sixth Circuit Court’s stated decision. “I can’t think of any reason other than bias against Christians and homeschoolers…I have vowed to fight to the very end on this, this is an injustice of a significant magnitude.”

Another possible reason for the court decision was offered by Karla McKanders, a refugee law expert at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville.

“They don’t want to open up the floodgates for similar asylum claims based on these grounds,” she suggested.

 

Top







NOTE: If someone forwarded this email to you and you would like to receive more like this, click HERE to Register. For more information about Tennessee Eagle Forum, go HERE.
Bookmark and Share

Forward this email to a friend

Join our mailing list!
 


     



Did you miss the November 20th post? You can see it HERE.

WE WOULD REALLY LIKE TO START THE 2014 LEGISLATIVE SESSION WELL FINANCED FOR THE BATTLE AHEAD

You can help by going to our website and using the DONATE button (bottom left of page) or you can send your check (not tax deductible) to
Tennessee Eagle Forum
3216 Bluewater Trace
Nashville, TN 37217
     
Homeschool Organization Joins Fight After Court Orders Children to Attend School for 'Socialization'
PURCELLVILLE, Va. – A nationally-recognized homeschool organization has filed a friend of the court brief in support of a mother who had been homeschooling her children until she was recently ordered to send them to school to socialize.

Therese Cano of Florida has been in an ongoing child visitation battle with her husband, and during the process of arbitration, the court had appointed a psychologist and a guardian ad litem to oversee the matter.

During a recent hearing, the psychologist testified that the children, who were being homeschooled by their mother, were doing well academically. However, the guardian ad litem told the court that her “gut reaction” was that the children should be sent to public school where they could socialize with others.

As a result, the judge ordered that the children attend public school and lectured Cano about keeping them at home.
 

“When are they going to socialize?” he asked the mother, according to reports. “Is homeschool going to continue through college and/or professional schooling? At which point are these children going to interact with other children, and isn’t that in their best interest?”

Cano’s husband, Alejandro, had raised no objection to the way the children were being schooled.

Therefore, following the ruling, Cano contacted the Homeschool Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) and explained her story. The organization then decided to file an amicus brief in support of the right to homeschool and to prove that homeschooled children receive adequate socialization.

“It is truly unfortunate that after decades of homeschooling parents are still fighting a battle against ignorance and ‘What about socialization?’ ” Jim Mason, HSLDA’s litigation counsel wrote in a report about the matter. “We see this as an excellent opportunity to educate judges in Florida about homeschooling success.”